STRONG EVIDENCE that "Stab & Grab" Biopsies ARE RISKY - Demand An Excisional Biopsy to Reduce Risk of Spreading Cancer

This FIVE YEAR STUDY compared outcomes of those receiving three types of biopsy and the results were profound showing that manipulation of an intact tumor with biopsy rather than removing (excising) the tumor (with poking/typing done after it is outside the body) correlates with the greatly increased chances of encountering cancer in the lymph nodes.

An EXCISIONAL BIOPSY of breast tumor is one that removes the entire mass in question rather than poking the mass and taking a sample of it. Only after the tumor is out of the body is the tumor punctured for testing.

Sadly, this option of excisional biopsy is kept as a big secret and few know to insist on excisional biopsy. A decades old study proved the danger of “stab and grab” punctures of tumors still in the body. Women who received biopsies using Fine Needle Aspiration (sounds safe, eh?) and large-gauge needle core biopsy had higher metastases (cancer spreading) in sentinel nodes than those who had excisional biopsies!

Another way that we know “stab and grab” biopsy can cause spreading is that the surgeon’s report form (post-surgery) has the question “Was there budding in the needle path?” This means “did any tissue fall off the needle and grow in the path where the tissue was drug out?”.

This question alone proves it is possible for “stab and grab” methods to spread cancer, and ESPECIALLY risky if the woman decides to reject surgical removal of a cancer discovered by “stab & grab” types of biopsy, leaving the punctured tumor and any tissue dropped into the needle path to “bud” or grow.

So how is it that a doctor can claim that “poking/puncturing” a tumor will not spread cancer? Well, it is the surgeon’s job to remove not only the tumor and margins around the tumor but also the entire needle path through which the tissue was drug out of the body.

Per the study linked above, excisional biopsy appears to reduce this risk, likely because the tumor is not punctured, nor is any tissue drug out from the tumor. The tumor or mass is simply removed surgically without being manipulated/punctured assuming the surgeon is competent in performing a proper excisional biopsy.

If biopsy is being recommended, it could be crucial to one’s health to insist upon only excisional biopsy. Reject “stab and grab” types like fine needle aspiration or core biopsy and request excisional biopsy if you wish to reduce risk of spreading cancer as clearly appears to be the risk per the linked study above.

While the study concludes with “The clinical significance of this phenomenon is unclear” it does not take a rocket scientist to realize that excisional biopsy is correlated with better outcomes than “stab and grab” types of biopsy.

Skechers Increase Estrogen!?? - Two Popular Shoe Brands Boast Sustainability of Using Soy Based Plastics! Good For Enviro ~ Horrible for Humans

Could my Oka-B flip-flops be the source of the estrogen pattern that showed up in my breast thermogram? Yes!

Oka-B (pictured above) and Skechers Shoes are proud of their SOY BASED Plastic SHOES! Are those cute shoes contributing to breast cancer and for men, how about those sport shoes contributing to man boobs?

Recently I purchased two pairs of Oka-B sandals after an old pair bit the dust - my other pair could go any minute and did not want to be without.  Then I stumbled upon the shocking fact that Oka-B’s are made with soy! No mention of it being organic soy either, which means the likelihood of endocrine wrecking glyphosate (i.e., RoundUp - a known xenoestrogen) also being on board thanks to genetic modification is virtually certain, and the presence of plant phytoestrogens were a given.

Humans are the only mammals with sweat glands on the bottoms of their feet!  Skin areas that sweat are more likely to be affected by EDC’s (endocrine disruptive chemicals) than non-sweating areas because the acidity of sweat assists in the breakdown of the EDC’s!  So one is getting a double whammy of poison with soy plastics vs petroleum plastics! Rats, goodbye Oka-B’s!

Skechers, a hugely popular brand with its own stores is also proud of its “sustainable” soy based plastic but does it sustain humans or sabotage them hormonally?

Maybe it’s time to go back to wearing “beautiful” Birkenstock’s…

Glyphosate (ingredient in ROUNDUP Weed Killer) INDUCES Breast Cancer Cells Growth

This is old but widely unknown news from the Food Chemical Toxicology “glyphosate contamination in soybeans” appears to be the biggest culprit but also many are still unaware of the big 5 crops that are genetically modified so that they will withstand multiple sprayings of Roundup. Try spraying it on your garden and you will see that it kills everything.

Big 5 GMO crops to Avoid:
soy
corn
canola
cottonseed
sugar beets

Sugar that is not labeled “organic” or “cane” will be from GMO sugar beets. Oils from soy, corn, canola, cottonseed are in so many things it will blow your mind. Also mind-blowing is that cancer patients are not typically warned about this nor is the hospital food free from glyphosate-containing foods nor is it advised in dietary advice from the hospital to avoid foods containing glyphosate.

Off the topic of breast cancer but important research on the subject and a possible second pathway of contributing to breast cancer is disruption of the detoxification process:

“Glyphosate chelates aluminum, allowing ingested aluminum to bypass the gut barrier.” (What about INJECTED aluminum!?) Glyphosate is linked to disruption of the gut-brain communication via disruption of the P450 cycle of the liver detoxification process, so the process by which a body would detox the chemical gets broken by the substance that needs to be detoxed. Dr. Stephanie Seneff has been warning us for at least two decades about this risk. She believes glyphosate is the biggest contributor to the escalating autism rates, and why symptoms can greatly improve with diet changes.

Lots of people are suffering from gut issues, bloating, gas, pain without having a clue as to its origin which could very well be glyphosate coming into their bodies.

It’s even in the air due to fuels being made with GMO corn that when burned aerosolizes the glyphosate according to experts. Even though advertised as “sustainable”, it’s probably best to avoid these fuels when possible, as well as the big five “body fuels” listed above.

The estrogenic effects of these crops may be one of the biggest contributors to the epidemic of estrogen dominance we see in men and women’s breasts.

Were you flagged with the estrogen dominance hormone pattern in your breasts? If you don’t know, contact us and we will look it up. Most thermography clinics typically do not report this pattern, so choose wisely if you are looking for thermography services. You want to receive not only this hormone pattern information but also you want to receive TH scores for each breast (TH1-TH5 are possible) and detail about location of findings.